“Do you know there is another Esther Mollema? I am mainly interested in her. ”
An unexpected meeting with a board member of a prospect. Everything in his office radiated power and distance. I knew he was against the planned training on diversity and inclusion and had suggested canceling it. He did not see the point of it. The newly appointed diversity manager had asked me to help convince the board member that the planned training was a good plan.
The board member immediately told me that he had done his homework and googled me. He complimented me on my extensive and interesting experience in diversity and inclusion experience. After which the conversation took an unexpected turn. “Do you know that there is another Esther Mollema in the Netherlands? She knows a lot about a topic that is very important to us: High Performance Organisations. I am mainly interested in her. Do you know her?”
0.2 FTE on diversity
I was confused. Was this comment meant to be funny? I didn’t see a smile or a raised eyebrow, so I replied cautiously: “I am that Esther Mollema too. I have two specialisations: Diversity & Inclusion and High Performance Organisations. I am very interested in both, and the two areas have a big overlap. Both topics are mainly about good leadership.”
Now he was a bit confused, but what followed was an animated conversation. After 30 minutes, he said: “I think you should come and tell us about both of these topics in our planned meeting”. He indicated that the team would be very interested in everything concerning HPO. But he didn’t think I would create much enthusiasm for the topic of more diversity and inclusion. The team considered those topics as a must-do for the organisation. Something particularly socially desirable that one could not openly oppose to. And something an organisation should not spend too much time on. The 0.2 FTE appointment for diversity was the hard-fought decision taken on this subject during the previous board meeting. The last thing I heard him say when I walked down the hallway was: “You get exactly two hours to convince us.”
Get rid of the hypes: the HPO model
During the training, I immediately took up the High Performance Organisation model. This model is the result of hard work by the HPO Center and especially André de Waal. Over a period of five years, he studied 290 scientific and management publications to identify the very characteristics for high performance. The HPO Center then tested the first models with more than 50,000 participants worldwide in 1,475 organisations. Statistical analysis of the data collected then showed that 35 characteristics are directly related to competitive performance. These characteristics were then grouped into five groups of HPO factors. He discovered that organisations scoring higher than their peer group on these five factors perform better than that peer group regarding financial and other criteria. Learning to use the HPO model will help you perform even better.
What is especially interesting is that the 35 HPO characteristics are stable over time and not subject to management trends. New hype words about management are added all the time, but the HPO model proves the management essentials’ consistent relevance.
GOOD LEADERSHIP IS ESSENTIAL
I explained how HPO Center started working with this model every day since 2008. The simple model is very rich and indicates what you should do and, just as interesting, what you should not. If it is not in the model, it has proven not to contribute significantly to an organisation’s result. Based on the HPO model, we examined organisations on their request. Together with their teams, we determined how they could perform better by a slightly different focus and adjusted actions.
Over time, we learned to use the HPO model more skilfully. We discovered patterns of inadequate interventions and time and again, we concluded how crucial good leadership is for an organisation. When more and more organisations started working agile and switched to self-management or self-organisation, the HPO Center continuously stressed the importance of good leadership because it proved that organisations perform better. No matter what the title is, be it leader, manager, coach, or agile team coach.
Some management and leadership tasks need to be well organised and performed to optimise collaboration and performance. The HPO model screams leadership. Listed under Quality of Leadership, twelve characteristics of the total 35 characteristics are included in the model. The other four factors also contain several characteristics that the leader must initiate. Overall, the success of 23 of the 35 characteristics is primarily determined by the manager or leader. In our opinion, good teams with bad leaders do not exist, just as bad teams with good leaders don’t exist. Good leaders make or break a team and the success of an organisation. As a result, the HPO Center’s statement is: without good leadership, no good result.
HPO MODEL AND DIVERSITY
Leaders largely determine the success of teams. They have two important assignments as a leader. One of the assignments is to provide clarity and allow speed to a team. This is where the leader uses his or her power to make decisions, bring focus and create clarity so that people can do their work in an attuned, good and fast manner. A capable leader ensures rapid decision-making in which all alternatives are expertly considered. Diversity in teams can improve decision-making. Research has often pointed out that diversity in a team can lead to a better strategy, more creativity, and faster innovation. A diverse team appears to be better at weighing up the possible alternatives when making a decision. In a more homogeneous team, people come to a decision faster without looking at all the alternatives. As a result, you miss opportunities.
HPO MODEL AND LEADERSHIP: CAN YOU DO IT?
The other side of leadership is the inclusive part of it. This part of leadership involves paying attention to individual employees by helping, coaching, inspiring, and guiding them. These tasks are often less visible but of great importance for good performance. Of the 24 focus areas of leaders in HPO organisations, 9 are about using your power as a leader. No fewer than 16 are mainly about inclusive leadership: making everyone in a team feel at home.
ADJUSTING TO THE AVERAGE?
More than half of your leadership tasks help create an inclusive environment for all employees. This means an environment in which they feel free and open to express their ideas without feeling embarrassed or insecure. Creating this safety for all employees is a challenge, especially since all employees are different. Every individual requires a personal approach. This does not only concern visible diversity (e.g. gender, age, skin color) but also invisible diversity (e.g. social class, education, experience, attitude to life, preferred style). Tailoring to your team member’s individual needs takes time and attention, but it will certainly payback. Are you unable to make time to do these tasks properly? The consequence is, perhaps unconsciously, that you ask your employees to adapt to some sort of average. Everyone gives up a little bit of themselves to make it easier for the leader to manage. That seems like a good idea, but it seriously impairs performance. Those teams often cannot perform to the max. Tensions are not pronounced, dialogues are avoided, team members who are ‘good’ together form subgroups. Without good leadership in teams, prejudices often play a role. People act on their unconscious prejudices and therefore do not make the best use of each other’s talents. Taking advantage of diversity in teams requires the inclusion of all team members. Ensuring that team members do not have to adjust too much to an average gives a team a boost. And it is the leader who must make this possible.
COMMITMENT AND APPRECIATION
Social psychologist, university professor at Utrecht University, Noami Ellemers, whose research I always follow, comes with several striking examples. “We looked at the functioning of cultural minorities in the workplace, for example among Muslim women. If encouraged to adapt to the majority, these women felt less engaged in the work and had less ambition to perform well or progress to a higher position. Only when they felt that their cultural identity was valued and they were allowed to be themselves did their work motivation increase. Paradoxically, once valued, they turned out to be more willing to meet the wishes of the organisation. We saw a similar pattern among gay employees. Those who did their best to fit in by hiding their sexual preferences and behaving like others performed worst. In general, we see that attempts to hide a stigma make people feel less satisfied and engaged at work. They experience shame and guilt about what they are trying to keep hidden, and therefore function less well among their colleagues. Those who ‘come out’ eventually feel more accepted and involved and collaborate better – because they no longer have to hide anything.”
IT DOESN’T ALWAYS WORK
An HPO manager ensures inclusion works and keeps learning, every day. Every time a team changes composition, a new search begins to get to know each other, to provide the new team member with a safe environment, and to adjust the team’s ways to give the other person space. Just as sports coaches do with a new player in a team, so do HPO leaders in their teams. You can imagine that an active leadership task is much more extensive than that of a leader who has only led homogeneous groups of people. A meta-survey in the US showed that in organisations where white men traditionally dominated, more diversity often did not lead to better results. Benefiting from diversity requires a lot of attention from the leader, especially if this leader has little experience with inclusion and diversity.
INCLUSION INSTEAD OF QUOTAS
A lot of attention for inclusive leadership is needed to hire the best talent (however diverse) and to build an HPO with these people. Building High Performance Organisations is strongly linked to creating inclusion and inviting diversity to really participate. In building a strong organisation, the focus should not be on the degree of diversity, as quotas do. The emphasis should then be on the way in which managers deal with differences between employees in teams. In an inclusive climate, they communicate to employees that differences are necessary and useful. They do not expect everyone to behave exactly the same, and as a result, all employees will feel part of it, and they will combine their contributions to improve collaboration and performance.
“First, we will have to do it ourselves!”
The workshop took place one week after my conversation with the board member. As always before a training session, I arrived with a curious attitude and some light ‘pre-game’ tension. Would the members of the board recognise the link between success as HPO and diversity and inclusion?
We managed to start the dialogue and just before two hours had passed one of the members of the board said: “We have serious work to do. We are those leaders who have far too little experience with diversity and inclusion. With our leadership style, we are very good at wasting diverse talent. It is not the diversity manager who has work to do, we have. It has to start with us.” On the face of the board member that I had spoken to one week before, a cautious smile emerged. “Let’s start with a training inclusive leadership for ourselves,” he said. “It will start with us.”
The first step was taken and proved to be a success. Their journey kicked off with focussing half a day on the unconscious bias with revealing test results. And all board members started working with the results of our feedforward analysis™ which gives insight into their individual qualities to achieve inclusion. These leaders gain new insights via this 360-degree tool based on HPO. Exciting and fun. I’ll speak to the team again next week.
Factor 1: Quality of management
Features that make the difference:
- The management of our organisational unit enjoys the confidence of everyone in the unit.
- The management of our organisational unit is honest.
- The management of our organisational unit has an exemplary role for its employees, it walks the talk.
- The management of our organisational unit takes decisions quickly.
- The management of our organisational unit takes action quickly.
- The management of our organisational unit coaches employees to achieve better results.
- The management of our organisational unit is focused on achieving results.
- The management of our organisational unit is effective.
- The management of our organisational unit consists of strong leaders.
- The management of our organisational unit radiates confidence.
- The management of our organisational unit is decisive in dealing with employees who perform ‘below par’.
- The management of our organisational unit always holds employees responsible for their results.
Factor 2: Openness and action orientation
Features that make the difference:
- In our organisational unit, management often enters into a dialogue* with employees.
- Employees in our organisational unit spend a lot of time exchanging knowledge and learning.
- Employees in our organisational unit are always involved in important organisational processes.
- In our organisational unit, management allows mistakes to be made.
- The management in our organisational unit is open to change.
- Our organisational unit is performance-oriented.
Factor 3: Long-term focus
Features that make the difference:
- Our organisational unit maintains good long-term relationships with all stakeholders (customers, suppliers, partners, etc.).
- Our organisational unit is focused on the best possible service to its customers.
- The management in our organisational unit has been working for the organisation for a long time.
- New management grows from within the organisation.
- Our organisational unit forms a safe working environment for employees.
Factor 4: Continuous improvement and renewal
Features that make the difference:
- The entire organisation has a strategy that is clearly distinct from other organisations.
- Work processes are constantly being improved in our organisational unit.
- Work processes are continuously simplified in our organisational unit.
- In our organisational unit, the work processes are continuously coordinated.
- All that is relevant for achieving good performance is reported to our organisational unit.
- In our organisational unit, relevant financial and non-financial information is made available to managers and employees.
- Our organisational unit continuously improves its core competencies.
- Our organisational unit constantly renews its products, services, and processes.
Factor 5: Quality of the employees
Features that make the difference:
- The management of our organisational unit encourages employees to achieve very good results.
- Employees in our organisational unit are continuously encouraged to strengthen their flexibility and resilience.
- Our organisational unit has diverse employees and our staff is complementary to each other.
- Our organisational unit creates growth through collaboration with other organisations.
Box B: Characteristics of inclusive leadership in the HPO model
- Enjoying the confidence of employees
- Acting with integrity
- A role model
- Coaching
- Seeking dialogue
- Make time for knowledge exchange and learning with the team
- Involving employees in important organisational processes
- Stimulating a growth mindset: together learning from mistakes
- Open mind to change
- Maintaining long-term relationships with all stakeholders
- Focus on the best possible service to customers
- Loyalty to organisation
- Focus on employee development and growth
- Creating physically and psychologically safe teams
- Encouraging employees to achieve excellent results stimulates flexibility and resilience of teams and employees
Sources
- www.hpocenter.nl
- www.feedforwardanalyse.nl
- www.mindbugstest.nl
- The Role of Context in Work Team Diversity Research: a Meta-Analytic Review, Joshi and Roh, Academy of Management Journal, 30 November 2017
- Diversiteit op de werkvloer heeft pas meerwaarde als verschil er mag zijn, Noami Ellemers, Sociale Vraagstukken, 26 January 2018